OUTLINE OF UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE TACTICS
The tactics employed by the US DOJ are designed to allow US law enforcement to effectively investigate child abuse and other criminal activity overseas where they have no legal jurisdiction and minimal resources. One factor that affects how these tactics are implemented is the corruption in local law enforcement or police volunteers that might learn of investigations and alert criminals before they can be apprehended.
Tactics were necessary In order to thwart this corruption and effect successful arrests but the US Embassy, PEARCE, FBI-LA, FBI-BKK and ICE’s official position is they cannot be involved and have for two years asserted to HOBBS “Your case has nothing to do with the United States Government”. However, PEARCE has stated most accurately “He (HOBBS) was arrested by Thai Authorities and investigated by FBI-LA” and “FBI has a parallel investigation” clearly contradicting the Embassy and DOJ’s false assertions.
To get around this problem and the fact that US DOJ officials have no legal authority to investigate crimes or make arrests in foreign countries, a tactic was created to allow the DOJ the opportunity to completely obstruct, manipulate and control any local law enforcement’s investigations involving Americans which is exactly what has happened in the case against HOBBS. The chronology and graphical investigative timeline will provide a clear understanding of the investigative timelines and inter Agency interaction and show that the DOJ’s alleged “parallel investigation” is completely false.
The US DOJ’s tactic of recruiting NGO’s in foreign countries and funding a center run by this NGO where local law enforcement are encouraged by US and international law enforcement to bring abused children and the NGO can assist Agents to investigate crimes involving Americans. At first glance, the establishment and funding of this center might appear to be noble gesture by the US Government but recruiting private individuals to perform investigative functions is a violation of Thailand criminal code section 145 and others. Under this law, private individuals are prohibited to perform any investigative functions of law enforcement represent themselves as performing law enforcement functions or possess or disseminate personal information about anyone.
However, what the DOJ has not disclosed is that these NGO’s are at the same time recruited as a CHS who is financially compensated and under obligation to the DOJ to inform them of crimes committed by Americans. The CHS is prohibited from reporting to anyone other than US law enforcement of crimes involving Americans without DOJ prior approval. The recruited NGO’s willingly comply with the DOJ’s requirements because they receive financial compensation for their hard work and successful arrests if they report the crimes to the DOJ and receive nothing if they reported to their own local law enforcement.
Recruiting enough NGO’s in problem areas around the world effectively allows the US DOJ in any foreign country to completely control;
1) what crimes get investigated
2) when crimes are investigate
3) what Americans get investigated;
4) when local law enforcement are notified
5) what evidence is released to local law enforcement
6) what evidence the DOJ wants local law enforcement to consider in their investigation
7) the NGO can arrange for access to abused children
8) the center can be used as a place to conduct illegal interrogations of minor children without the encumbrances of the local law.
Although this tactic achieved the FBI-LA’s objective, implementing any tactics that control, delay, interfere, manipulate, influence, suppress reporting criminal activity and evidence to local law enforcement in a foreign nation is nothing less than willful and intentional obstruction of justice and withholding of evidence in a sovereign foreign nation.
As with any well intentioned tactic, the successful execution depends upon the diligence and the integrity of those implementing the plan. Because this tactic is covert, all checks and balances that would otherwise protect children and innocent suspects from unlawful invasion of privacy and other activity are bypassed. A very serious side effect of this tactic is that any American including innocent ones become targets for corrupt foreign NGO’s and police or just as important their own corrupt law enforcement.
Not only did this tactic achieve the DOJ’s objectives of obtaining information about American’s committing crimes, corrupt NGO’s in impoverished nations can simply invent crimes and extort testimony from vulnerable victims and fabricate testimony as necessary. This will assure arrests of Americans which is clearly singular objective of these DOJ officials. The US DOJ handlers of these NGO’s have no motivation to prevent this activity even when they are fully aware of the facts and consequences to their citizens because their arrest record and professional careers are enhanced without having to be directly involved with the corrupt acts.
Since FBI have no authority to make arrests in foreign nations, it must be assumed that the original intent of this tactic would have been that once the informant and FBI were able to obtain sufficient evidence to obtain an arrest warrant, local authorities would be engaged to initiate the arrest. Clearly that was likely the intention of FBI-LA until November 29, 2013 when ICE interfered with his investigation of STRIKE’s crimes at MIDTOWN when they found fugitive serial child sex predator STRIKE at MIDTOWN.
On December 12, 2013, it became necessary for PEARCE, ICE and FBI-LA to develop an alternative tactic since FBI-LA and NOJA had not previously obtained enough evidence to justify initiating HOBBS’ arrest. FBI-LA, NOJA had not obtained any more evidence after the June 2013 interrogations of the THAI VICTIM but inexplicably on December 12, 2013 there became enough evidence to implicate HOBBS and conceal STRIKE.
The alternative tactic required would involve deceiving CBIP into assisting ICE to arrest and deport STRIKE while at the same time deceiving RTP into investigating only HOBBS to secure his arrest also. This conspiracy by two US DOJ Agencies and PEARCE was facilitated by the US DOJ’s ability to manipulate when and what evidence was to be released and to whom any evidence would be provided.
As with any investigation or “frame up”, incriminating an innocent person is simply a matter of managing the timing of the release of evidence and manipulating what evidence was released and presented to authorities having legal authority to make an arrest. The NGO’s and foreign law enforcement would achieve the US DOJ’s desired result regardless of the truth, justice or their exploitation of the child victims to sign falsified testimony.